Walker v. Sealed Air Corporation
Plaintiff: Carlos Walker
Defendant: Sealed Air Corporation
Case Number: 6:2018cv03110
Filed: November 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Referring Judge: Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2018 Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER Mediation Due by 6/19/2019, Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 12/28/2018. (kric, )
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 1/17/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 1/31/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 1/31/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/13/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/12/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/13/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/13/2019, Discovery due by 6/12/2019, Motions due by 6/26/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/6/2019, Jury Selection Deadline 10/7/2019, Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 12/28/2018. (kric, )
December 20, 2018 Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Sealed Air Corporation.(Foster, William) (Main Document 10 replaced on 12/21/2018 to correct footnote) (jtho, ).
November 27, 2018 Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Carlos Walker.(Arnold, Brian)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting the defendant's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise respond with consent of the plaintiff. Answer due 12/21/18. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 11/19/18.(ctuc, )
November 19, 2018 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Sealed Air Corporation. Response to Motion due by 12/3/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(Foster, William)
November 19, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE that the plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 interrogatories are due by 12/3/2018. (kric, )
November 16, 2018 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sealed Air Corporation.(kric, )
November 16, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-23-05172. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8113512), filed by Sealed Air Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Notice of Filing Removal)(kric, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Sealed Air Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Walker
Represented By: Brian E Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sealed Air Corporation
Represented By: William H Foster, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?