Herren v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Beverly Herren |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record |
| 6:2019cv01579 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (abuc) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (abuc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Beverly Herren. Response to Motion due by 6/14/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(abuc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Beverly Herren. Service due by 8/29/2019 (Attachments: #1 Fee Agreement)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
