Ashmore v. Nazarek
Beattie B Ashmore |
Christian Nazarek and Kim Nazarek |
6:2020cv02102 |
June 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1367 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Beattie B Ashmore re #7 Request for Entry of Default, 8 Clerk's Entry of Default, #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Christian Nazarek a/k/a Kim Nazarek (Tollison, Lewis) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Christian Nazarek a/k/a Kim Nazarek by Beattie B Ashmore. Response to Motion due by 8/7/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Tollison, Lewis) |
Filing 8 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Christian Nazarek (alew, ) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT byBeattie B Ashmore. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Default)(Tollison, Lewis) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Beattie B Ashmore. Christian Nazarek served on 6/20/2020, answer due 7/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Main Document Return of Service)(Tollison, Lewis) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Christian Nazarek. (alew, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Beattie B Ashmore.(alew, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christian Nazarek ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9135077.), filed by Beattie B Ashmore. Service due by 9/1/2020(alew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.