Smith v. Hughes et al
| Khammesherma Smith |
| Shelton L Hughes, Jr and Major Robert D Kelly |
| 6:2020cv03294 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Proper Form Order, 8 Terminate Motions placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Khammesherma Smith 40 Trailwood Drive Sumter, SC 29154 with 2 USM285 forms (kric, ) |
| Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER. The plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is granted. Case to be brought into proper form by 10/26/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/5/2020. (kric, ) |
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Khammesherma Smith. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shelton L Hughes, Jr, Robert D Kelly, filed by Khammesherma Smith. Service due by 12/15/2020 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
