Howell v. Upgrade Inc
Lindsey Howell and Wallace Lindsey Howell |
Upgrade Inc |
6:2024cv04228 |
July 31, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
William S Brown |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 16 Case Reassigned, 17 Notice Change of Case Number placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Lindsey Howell, 202 Lindseybrook Trail, Mauldin, SC 29662. (rweb, ) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF CASE NUMBER, 6:24-cv-04228-JDA-WSB. Send all filings to Clerk of Court, 250 East North St, Greenville, SC 29601. (rweb, ) |
Filing 16 Case Reassigned to Judge Magistrate Judge William Stevens Brown. Judge Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to William Stevens Brown.(cwil, ) |
Filing 14 REPLY by Lindsey Howell to #13 Response in Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(pbri, ) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time MOTION to Amend/Correct Defendant Upgrade, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To Amend Complaint And For Extension Of Time To Respond To Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Response filed by Upgrade Inc.Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/16/2024 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Rowh, Chandler) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lindsey Howell re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time MOTION to Amend/Correct (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time and MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Lindsey Howell. Response to Motion due by 9/9/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Second Amended Complaint)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(rweb, ) Modified on 8/28/2024 see also #12 certificate of service (rweb, ). |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Lindsey Howell. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Roseboro Order placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Lindsey Howell, 202 Lindseybrook Trail, Mauldin, SC 29662. (rweb, ) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss by Upgrade Inc. Response to Motion due by 8/21/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(Siachos, Peter) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2024: #1 Memo in Support) (rweb, ). Modified on 8/8/2024 to add Memorandum in Support (rweb, ). |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order and public docket sheet placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Lindsey Howell, 202 Lindseybrook Trail, Mauldin, SC 29662. (rweb, ) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Upgrade Inc.(rweb, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024-CP-23-04076. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11908020), filed by Upgrade Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Amended Complaint, #3 Certificate of Service Complaint, #4 Certificate of Service Amended Complaint)(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.