Universal Forest Products Eastern Division Inc v. Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Universal Forest Products Eastern Division Inc
Defendant:
W E Mitchell
Case Number:
7:2008cv03943
Filed:
December 4, 2008
Court:
South Carolina District Court
Office:
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office
County:
Spartanburg
Presiding Judge:
Henry M Herlong
Nature of Suit:
Plaintiff
Cause of Action:
Diversity
Jury Demanded By:
28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
October 13, 2009 | 15 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Universal Forest Products Eastern Division Inc v. Mitchell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Universal Forest Products Eastern Division Inc | |
Represented By: | Kimila L Wooten |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: W E Mitchell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.