Thompson v. Department of Treasury

Plaintiff: Dorothy Mae Thompson
Defendant: Department of Treasury
Case Number: 7:2012cv03379
Filed: November 28, 2012
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Spartanburg Office
County: Union
Referring Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28:7402 Refund of Taxes
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 15, 2013 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 21 Report and Recommendation; It is therefore ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and without service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 2/14/13. (alew, ) Modified on 2/15/2013 to edit text(alew, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Mae Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.