Manchin v. QS-1 Data Systems

Manchin v. QS-1 Data Systems

Plaintiff:	John Manchin, III
Defendant:	QS-1 Data Systems
Case Number:	7:2013cv02188
Filed:	August 12, 2013
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Spartanburg Office
County:	XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	G Ross Anderson
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2014	Filing 99 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall attend a second mediation in this case no later than July 7, 2014. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 7/1/14.(alew, )
August 12, 2013	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 17 , DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO AMEND 22 , AND TRANSFERRING CASE: The Court GRANTS IN PART the defendants motion to dismiss for improper venue 17 ; DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the plaintiffs motion to amend 22 , subject to refiling in the proper forum; TRANSFERS this action to the Spartanburg Division of the U.S. District Court for the District South Carolina; and ORDERS that this case be STRICKEN from the docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/12/13. (jss) [Transferred from West Virginia Northern on 8/13/2013.]

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2014

Filing 99 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall attend a second mediation in this case no later than July 7, 2014. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 7/1/14.(alew, )

August 12, 2013

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 17 , DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO AMEND 22 , AND TRANSFERRING CASE: The Court GRANTS IN PART the defendants motion to dismiss for improper venue 17 ; DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the plaintiffs motion to amend 22 , subject to refiling in the proper forum; TRANSFERS this action to the Spartanburg Division of the U.S. District Court for the District South Carolina; and ORDERS that this case be STRICKEN from the docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/12/13. (jss) [Transferred from West Virginia Northern on 8/13/2013.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manchin v. QS-1 Data Systems
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: QS-1 Data Systems
Represented By:	Robert Mason Barrett
Represented By:	Walter M White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Manchin, III
Represented By:	Timothy J. Manchin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?