Davy et al v. Duke Energy of The Carolinas LLC et al
| Frederick Charles Davy and Sharon Lee Davy |
| Duke Energy of The Carolinas LLC, Energy Conservation Solutions Inc, GreenSky Trade Credit LLC and Spartanburg County Building Codes and Fire Services |
| 7:2015cv04927 |
| December 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Spartanburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER granting 62 Motion for Entry of Consent Order. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/22/2016.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
61
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 59 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/11/2016.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 25 Motion to Remand; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in pa rt 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 22 ), is dismissed as to Defendant Spartanburg County, and Plaintiffs' claims for Negligent Supervision and Declaratory Judgment are dismissed as to Defendant Duke Energy and Defendant Greensky. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 3/4/2016.(abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
