Marshall Tucker Band Inc, The et al v. M T Industries Inc et al
Marshall Tucker Band Inc, The and Doug Gray |
M T Industries Inc and Ron Rainey |
7:2016cv00420 |
February 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Spartanburg Office |
Spartanburg |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 OPINION AND ORDER denying 77 Motion for Attorney Fees Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/12/2017.(abuc) |
Filing 86 AMENDED JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that the defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and Plaintiffs' federal trademark infringement and trademark dilution claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, whereas Plaintiffs' federal declaratory judgment and trademark cancellation claims and state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (abuc) |
Filing 76 JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that the defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. (abuc) |
Filing 53 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 52 Motion for Confidentiality Order Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/12/2016.(abuc) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 31 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/1/16.(alew, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.