Patel v. BMW Financial Services NA et al
| Anjay Patel |
| BMW Financial Services NA LLC and BMW Bank of North America |
| 7:2016cv03270 |
| September 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Spartanburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION accepting 21 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/8/17. (alew, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER directing Plaintiff to respond to the following inquiry clarifying the maximum extent of damages that he intended to pursue at the time this case was removed and, if the amount does not exceed $75,000, whether Plain tiff concedes that he does not intend to seek more at a later time. If Plaintiff did not intend to pursue damages adequate to satisfy the jurisdictional threshold at the time of filing and if he stipulates to such limitation having a binding effect, and if there is no federal question at issue, the undersigned will recommend to the presiding District Judge that this matter be remanded to state court. Plaintiff is directed to file his responses to these interrogatories by February 6, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 1/17/2017. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
