Edmunds v. Nestle USA Inc
Macio Edmunds, Jr |
Nestle Dreyers Ice Cream Company |
7:2017cv00229 |
January 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Spartanburg Office |
Spartanburg |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting 9 Consent MOTION to Substitute Party filed by Nestle USA Inc. Nestle Dreyers Ice Cream Company added. Nestle USA Inc terminated. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/13/2017. (abuc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Edmunds v. Nestle USA Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Macio Edmunds, Jr | |
Represented By: | Patrick Eugene Knie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nestle Dreyers Ice Cream Company | |
Represented By: | John F Kuppens |
Represented By: | Jay Thomas Thompson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.