Does 1-9 v. Murphy et al
Jane Does 1-9 |
MindGeek Holding SARL, Limestone College, Collins Murphy, MindGeek USA Inc, Hammy Media Ltd and MG Holdings USA Corp |
7:2020cv00947 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Timothy M Cain |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to MindGeek Holding SARL, a/k/a MG Holdings USA Corp. (kmca) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hammy Media Ltd, Limestone College, MindGeek Holding SARL, Collins Murphy, filed by Jane Does 1-9. Service due by 6/16/2020 (Attachments: # 1 Summons MG HOLDINGS USA CORP. SUMMONS) (Bell, James) Modified on 3/19/2020: to add text: names of defendants; to remove attachment - proposed summons are not filed with the court. (kmca). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hammy Media Ltd, Limestone College, MindGeek Holding SARL, Collins Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Summons Limestone College, #2 Summons MindGeek Holding SARL, #3 Summons Hammy Media Ltd)(kmca) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jane Does 1-9.(kmca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hammy Media Ltd, Limestone College, MindGeek Holding SARL, Collins Murphy (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8983775), filed by Jane Does 1-9. Service due by 6/2/2020.(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.