Goggin v. Blythe Construction Inc et al
| Thomas Goggin |
| Blythe Construction Inc, Zachry Construction Corp, Johnson Mirmiran and Thompson Inc, Cowan Systems LLC and John Allen Ferguson |
| 7:2021cv03158 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Johnson Mirmiran and Thompson Inc.(Stair, Kent) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Johnson Mirmiran and Thompson Inc.(Stair, Kent) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Strike by Johnson Mirmiran and Thompson Inc. Response to Motion due by 12/3/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Stair, Kent) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (alew, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Thomas Goggin.(alew, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10097936.), filed by Thomas Goggin. Service due by 12/29/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Agreement for the Design & Construction of Interstate 85 Reconstruction, #2 Exhibit B-Transportation Management Plan for SCDOT, #3 Exhibit C-Brian Bottomley's Affidavit of Merit)(alew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
