Marrero v. Michigan Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Juan E Marrero
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections
Case Number: 8:2010cv01699
Filed: July 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 ; It is ordered that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on September 30, 2010. (ncha, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marrero v. Michigan Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan E Marrero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?