McKune v. Bush
Petitioner: Whelthy McKune
Respondent: Dennis Bush
Case Number: 8:2017cv00189
Filed: January 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ADOPTS 20 Report and Recommendation. GRANTS 13 Respondent's motion for summary judgment and DISMISSES the petition for habeas relief. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/24/2017. (gpre, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKune v. Bush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Whelthy McKune
Represented By: Jeremy Adam Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dennis Bush
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?