Epps v. Hollister et al
| David Chad Epps |
| Doctor M Lutz, Patricia Rae, John Vandermosten, Ronald Hollister, Major Marshall Stowers and A Roberts |
| 8:2018cv02501 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| David C Norton |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #17 Order on Report and Recommendation, #18 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail to David Chad Epps (gpre, ) |
| Filing 18 JUDGMENT Case dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (gpre, ) |
Filing 17
ORDER affirming #15 Report and Recommendation, dismissing with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 11/5/2018.(eric, )
|
| Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Order - 1983 - No Service, #15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail to David Chad Epps (gpre, ) |
| Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommended that the District Court dismiss this action without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 10/26/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 10/12/2018. (gpre, ) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 10/12/2018. (gpre, )
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ronald Hollister, Marshall Stowers, John Vandermosten, filed by David Chad Epps. Service due by 12/27/2018 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gpre, ) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 Order Regarding Amendment, #9 Order, Court's Complaint form, placed in U.S. Mail to David Chad Epps (gpre, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER directing Plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/17/2018. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT. Plaintiff granted twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is entered (plus three days for mail time) to file an amended complaint that corrects deficiencies. Amended Complaint due by 10/9/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/14/2018. (gpre, ) Modified on 9/17/2018 to edit text (gpre, ).
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/17/2018.(gpre, )
|
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenville. (gpre, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by David Chad Epps. Response to Motion due by 9/24/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ronald Hollister, M Lutz, Patricia Rae, A Roberts, Marshall Stowers, John Vandermosten, filed by David Chad Epps. Service due by 12/10/2018 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gpre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
