Risner v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Jaime Lynn Risner |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administration Record |
| 8:2019cv00753 |
| March 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jaime Lynn Risner. Response to Motion due by 3/26/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(jsmi, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Jaime Lynn Risner. Service due by 6/10/2019 (Attachments: #1 Power of Attorney)(jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
