Whitaker v. Greenwood County School District 52 et al
Mamie Whitaker |
Rex Ward, David Schoolfield, Kaycee Bradley and Greenwood County School District 52 |
8:2019cv01930 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Mamie Whitaker.(Bowen, Elizabeth) |
Filing 15 Defendants' Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Kaycee Bradley, Greenwood County School District 52, David Schoolfield, Rex Ward.(Sherard, Joseph) |
Filing 14 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Kaycee Bradley, Greenwood County School District 52, David Schoolfield, Rex Ward.(Sherard, Joseph) |
Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Kaycee Bradley, Greenwood County School District 52, David Schoolfield, Rex Ward.(Sherard, Joseph) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Mamie Whitaker.Reply to Response to Motion due by 8/5/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Bowen, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Kaycee Bradley, Greenwood County School District 52, David Schoolfield, Rex Ward. Response to Motion due by 7/29/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(Sherard, Joseph) |
Filing 8 Defendants' Partial ANSWER to Complaint by Kaycee Bradley, Greenwood County School District 52, David Schoolfield, Rex Ward.(Sherard, Joseph) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 7/31/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 8/14/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 8/14/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/4/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/4/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/4/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 11/4/2019, Discovery due by 1/3/2020, Mediation Due by 2/3/2020, Motions due by 3/3/2020. **This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 7/10/19. (kmca) (Main Document 7 replaced on 7/11/2019: to remove duplicate initials from case number) (kmca). |
Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mamie Whitaker.(Bowen, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: Plaintiff's answers to local rule 26.01 interrogatories are due no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the notice of removal. (gpre, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Kaycee Bradley, Greenwood County School District 52, David Schoolfield, Rex Ward.(gpre, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenwood County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-cp-24-00616. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8543848), filed by Greenwood County School District 52, Rex Ward, David Schoolfield, Kaycee Bradley. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Notice to State Court, #3 Notice to Plaintiff)(gpre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.