Jones v. Dobbs
Petitioner: Hildra Jones
Respondent: Warden Bryan K Dobbs
Case Number: 8:2020cv02428
Filed: June 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2020 Filing 11 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re 7 Document Mailed served on Attoreny General for the US, DOJ on 08/17/20. (rweb, )
August 19, 2020 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 9 Order on Motion for Extension of Time placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Hildra Jones 98725-004 WILLIAMSBURG 3-B-Lower FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 340 SALTERS, SC 29590 (gpre, )
August 19, 2020 Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to file objection to the Report and Recommendation. Objections due by 9/20/2020. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 8/19/2020.(gpre, )
August 19, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time by Hildra Jones. Response to Motion due by 9/2/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) No proposed order. (rweb, )
August 10, 2020 Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED CERTIFIED 7015 3430 0000 7276 4434 #5 Order 2241 Federal Habeas and Petition, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Attorney General of The United States (rweb, )
August 7, 2020 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Hildra Jones placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Hildra Jones 98725-004 WILLIAMSBURG 3-B-Lower FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 340 SALTERS, SC 29590 (rweb, )
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 08/07/20. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(rweb, )
August 7, 2020 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus recommending that the 2241 Petition be dismissed without requiring the Respondent to file an answer or return. Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 08/07/20. (rweb, ) Modified on 8/7/2020 to edit text. (rweb, ).
June 29, 2020 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (gpre, )
June 25, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 Receipt number SCX300088201.), filed by Hildra Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gpre, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Dobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Bryan K Dobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Hildra Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?