Ward v. Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC et al
Charles Ward |
Assisted Living Concepts LLC doing business as Keowee Place Assisted Living Community and Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC doing business as Keowee Place |
8:2021cv01055 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Timothy M Cain |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 13 Order on Motion to Remand, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Melissa C. Burton, Oconee County Clerk of Court, PO Box 678, Walhalla, SC 29691-0678. (kmca) |
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED 13 Order on Motion to Remand, to Oconee County Clerk of Court, Melissa C. Burton, lburton@oconeesc.com. (kmca) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Consent Motion to Remand; finding as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 5/14/21.***Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court.*** (kmca) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION to Remand by Assisted Living Concepts LLC, Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC. Response to Motion due by 5/28/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Smyth, Todd) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER. Jurisdiction in this matter is predicated upon diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Defendants Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC and Assisted Living Concepts LLC are to inform the court of the citizenship of all members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied. See 28 U.S.C. 1332; Gen. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda, 388 F. 3d 114, 121 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding that "[a limited liability company] is an unincorporated association, akin to a partnership for diversity purposes, whose citizenship is that of its members."). Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 5/5/21. (kmca) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel Response filed by Assisted Living Concepts LLC, Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC. (Smyth, Todd) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel Arbitration Response filed by Charles Ward.Reply to Response to Motion due by 4/30/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Residency Agreement, #2 Exhibit DPOA)(Feidler, Stefan) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charles Ward.(Feidler, Stefan) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Assisted Living Concepts LLC, Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC. (Response to Motion due by 4/23/2021) (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Residency Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Durable Power of Attorney)No proposed order.(kmca) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Assisted Living Concepts LLC, Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC.(kmca) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oconee County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-37-00186. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9765760), filed by Inn at Seneca Aid Opco LLC, Assisted Living Concepts LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.