Davis v. Erickson et al
| Thomas Louis Davis |
| Eric J Erickson, Christine L Wilson, Larry Weidner, James Bukoffsky, Brian Chapman, Phillip Foote, Elizabeth Smith, Lester Williams, Gene Hood, Matthew Walker, Angela McCall Tanner, Larry Ballweg, Coleman Hookay Loo, Shalerria Webster, Evette Webster Robinson, Kevin R Cleveland and Joanne Dubose |
| 9:2007cv03976 |
| December 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Beaufort Office |
| Beaufort |
| G Ross Anderson |
| George C Kosko |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 83 55 45 After a review of the magistrates Report and Recommendation, applicable caselaw, and the record, this Court finds that the magistrate applied sound legal principlesto the facts of this case. Therefore, this Court adopts the Report andRecommendation in its entirety.IT IS ORDERED that the defendants motions for summary judgment beGRANTED.. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 3/16/09. (ahen, )
|
|
Filing
83
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Paige Gossett that the court recommends that the defendants motions forsummary judgment (Docket Entries 45, 55) be granted. 55 45 Objections to R&R due by 3/12/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige Jones Gossett on 2/23/09. (ahen, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
