Clark v. Busch
Petitioner: Dwayne R Clark
Respondent: Warden Busch
Case Number: 9:2014cv02002
Filed: May 23, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant; granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 9/10/2015.(cwhi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Busch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dwayne R Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Busch
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?