Witherspoon v. Lane
Plaintiff: Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon
Defendant: G Lane
Case Number: 9:2016cv03868
Filed: December 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant; denying without prejudice 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and withoutissuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/31/2017.(cwhi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Witherspoon v. Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?