Solis et al v. Cissna et al

Plaintiff: Tomasa Romero Solis, Heriberto Gonzalez Najera, Anareli Mendiola Romero, Edgar Mendiola Romero and Uan Carlos Mendiola Romero
Defendant: L Frank Cissna and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number: 9:2018cv00083
Filed: January 9, 2018
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Beaufort Office
County: Beaufort
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05:702
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 10, 2018 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER and OPINION granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs APA claim is denied and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs mandamus and due process claims is granted. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 8/10/2018.(vdru, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Solis et al v. Cissna et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomasa Romero Solis
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Stephanie Elizabeth Nodine
Represented By: Anna L Strandberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heriberto Gonzalez Najera
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Stephanie Elizabeth Nodine
Represented By: Anna L Strandberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anareli Mendiola Romero
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Stephanie Elizabeth Nodine
Represented By: Anna L Strandberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edgar Mendiola Romero
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Stephanie Elizabeth Nodine
Represented By: Anna L Strandberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Uan Carlos Mendiola Romero
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Stephanie Elizabeth Nodine
Represented By: Anna L Strandberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L Frank Cissna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?