GEICO Indemnity Company v. Norris et al
GEICO Indemnity Company |
Terry Lynn Defibaugh, Alexis Shanea Norris and Dennis James Folk |
9:2020cv03230 |
September 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by GEICO Indemnity Company. (Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GEICO Indemnity Company. Dennis James Folk served on 9/15/2020, answer due 10/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GEICO Indemnity Company. Terry Lynn Defibaugh served on 9/15/2020, answer due 10/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GEICO Indemnity Company. Alexis Shanea Norris served on 9/15/2020, answer due 10/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by GEICO Indemnity Company.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9332572.), filed by GEICO Indemnity Company. Service due by 12/9/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Policy of Insurance)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.