Garrett et al v. Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture
| Sandra Garrett and James Garrett |
| Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture |
| 3:2021cv03002 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Other Statutes: Agriculture Acts |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROPOSED ORDER by Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture re #12 MOTION to Enforce TO ENFORCE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA (Hofmann (USA), Michaele) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Troy Schaner re #12 MOTION to Enforce TO ENFORCE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subpoena 10416, #2 Exhibit B - Subpoena 10417, #3 Exhibit C - Customer Notice 10416, #4 Exhibit D - Customer Notice 10417, #5 Exhibit E - Notes 10416, #6 Exhibit F - Notes 10417, #7 Exhibit G - Postal receipt, #8 Exhibit H - Return receipt 10416, #9 Exhibit I - Return receipt 10417) (Hofmann (USA), Michaele) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Enforce TO ENFORCE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA filed by Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture. (Hofmann (USA), Michaele) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Enforce TO ENFORCE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA by Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture. (Hofmann (USA), Michaele) |
Filing 11
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on March 8, 2021. (DLC)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Electronically File Documents in CM/ECF. The Clerks Office shall arrange to train the pro se filer on how to e-file documents and issue the pro se filer a CM/ECF login and password after the training is completed. The ability of the pro se filer to e-file documents may be revoked anytime the Court deems it justified. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on February 22, 2021. (DLC)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Electronically File Documents in CM/ECF. The Clerks Office shall arrange to train the pro se filer on how to e-file documents and issue the pro se filer a CM/ECF login and password after the training is completed. The ability of the pro se filer to e-file documents may be revoked anytime the Court deems it justified. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on February 22, 2021. (DLC)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michaele S. Hofmann (USA) on behalf of Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture. (Hofmann (USA), Michaele) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Pro se party Sandra Garrett will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DLC) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Pro se party James Garrett will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DLC) |
| Filing Fee Received in full from James Garrett, Sandra Garrett. Fee Amount: $2.00, Receipt No.: #SDX300003708. (DLC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFFS: The Clerks Office has received your Complaints (Motions) together with 2 $400.00 payments toward the 2 $402.00 filing fees. Copy of Docket Sheet and CM/ECF Pro Se Litigant Application Form sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (DLC) |
| Filing 4 SWORN STATEMENT OF MOVANT by Plaintiffs James Garrett, Sandra Garrett re #3 Complaint (Motion for Order Pursuant to Customer Challenge Provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 - Great Western Bank) (DLC) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT (Motion for Order Pursuant to Customer Challenge Provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 - Great Western Bank). (DLC) Modified Docket Text on 2/3/2021 (DLC). |
| Filing 2 SWORN STATEMENT OF MOVANT by Plaintiffs James Garrett, Sandra Garrett re #1 Complaint (Motion for Order Pursuant to Customer Challenge Provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 - American Bank and Trust) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Motion for Order Pursuant to Customer Challenge Provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 - American Bank and Trust), $800.00 of the $804.00 ($402.00 per plaintiff) filing fee was paid, receipt# SDX. (DLC) Modified Docket Text on 2/3/2021 (DLC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
