Santel Communications Cooperative, Inc. v. United States of America

Plaintiff: Santel Communications Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 4:2008cv04038
Filed: March 20, 2008
Court: South Dakota District Court
Office: Taxes Office
County: Sanborn
Presiding Judge: Lawrence L. Piersol
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 26:6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2010 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying as moot 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 3/12/2010. (KC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santel Communications Cooperative, Inc. v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Santel Communications Cooperative, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.