Peters v. Action Carrier, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mary E. Peters
Defendant: Action Carrier, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2008cv04185
Filed: November 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. Office
County: Minnehaha
Presiding Judge: Lawrence L. Piersol
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 49:11702(a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Entering Preliminary Injunction; granting 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 2/13/09. (SKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Action Carrier, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary E. Peters
Represented By: Peter J. Phipps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Action Carrier, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?