Cobb v. Knode et al
| Matthew Cobb |
| Stanley Knode, R. Arnett, Marci Harvison, Robert Kuemper, Tom Linneweber, Doug Loen, Al Madsen, K. Wright, Douglas Weber, Tim Reisch, Mark Bidne and Delmar Walter |
| 4:2009cv04110 |
| July 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Minnehaha |
| Lawrence L. Piersol |
| John E. Simko |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER denying 89 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 91 Motion to Expedite; granting in part 93 Motion to Extend; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion to Compel; denying 100 Motion to Strike; granting in part 102 Motion to Extend; denying 103 Motion to Strike; denying 105 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 108 Motion to Extend; granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion to Compel; denying 111 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by U.S.Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 9/8/10. (DJP)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying as moot 52 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 71 Motion for Protective Order; denying 71 Motion to Stay; denying 77 Motion for Hearing; granting 77 Motion to Proceed Under Hardship; granting 77 Motion to Withdraw Default; denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by U.S.Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 3/26/2010. (CG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
