Hughbanks v. Dooley et al
Kevin L. Hughbanks |
Robert Dooley, Tim Reisch, Susan Jacobs, Tami DeJong, Randy Stevens and Nichole St. Pierre |
4:2010cv04064 |
June 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Southern Division Office |
Bon Homme |
Karen E. Schreier |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 116 ORDER granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 2/2/2012. (KC) |
Filing 115 ORDER granting stay of discovery; denying 95 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 8/10/2011. (KC) |
Filing 94 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 5/3/2011. (KC) |
Filing 93 ORDER denying 56 Motion for TRO; denying 56 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 77 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 4/19/2011. (KC) |
Filing 81 ORDER denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration; denying as premature 54 Motion for application of prison mailbox rule; denying as premature 55 Motion to define terms. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 2/23/2011. (KC) |
Filing 42 ORDER denying 31 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 26 Motion for TRO; denying as moot 27 Motion to Withdraw ; denying 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 29 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/28/2010. (KC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.