Cody v. McDonald et al
William Cody |
Ashley McDonald, Tim Meirose, Darin Young, Heather Bowers, Jessica Stevens, Kayla Tinker, Mary Carpenter, Linda Miller-Hunoff, Steve Baker and Jennifer Wagner |
4:2014cv04155 |
October 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Southern Division Office |
Minnehaha |
Veronica L. Duffy |
Roberto A. Lange |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 99 Order denying 87 Motion to Amend/Correct, overruling 107 Objection re 99 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 1/6/2017. (JLS) |
Filing 95 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 85 Motion to Compel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 10/11/2016. (CG) |
Filing 72 ORDER granting in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 3/30/2016. (CG) |
Filing 65 OPINION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 58 Report and Recommendation; overruling 60 Objection to Report and Recommendation; overruling 64 Objection to Report and Recommendation. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 03/14/2016. (LH) |
Filing 30 ORDER denying 29 Motion to Stay. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 7/1/2015. (CG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.