Pendleton v. 1st Financial Bank, USA
Plaintiff: Linda Pendleton
Defendant: 1st Financial Bank, USA
Case Number: 4:2016cv04171
Filed: December 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Southern Division Office
County: Aurora
Presiding Judge: Lawrence L. Piersol
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 18 Motion to Stay. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/11/17. (SLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pendleton v. 1st Financial Bank, USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Pendleton
Represented By: Kas L. Gallucci
Represented By: Cesar A. Juarez
Represented By: Ronald A. Marron
Represented By: Alexis M. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1st Financial Bank, USA
Represented By: Elizabeth S. Hertz
Represented By: Vincent M. Roche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?