Fredricks v. Saul
Tania M. Fredricks |
Andrew Saul |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
4:2021cv04087 |
May 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Karen E Schreier |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Attorney as to Andrew Saul. Attorney Meghan K. Roche added.. (Roche, Meghan) |
Filing 7 (FILED IN ERROR) Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Attorney as to Andrew Saul. Attorney Meghan K. Roche added. Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell terminated. (Roche, Meghan) Modified Docket Text on 6/30/2021 (DLC). |
NOTICE of Filing Error: #7 Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Attorney was filed in error and should be disregarded. (Roche, Meghan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alison J. Ramsdell on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Ramsdell, Alison) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to USA. Summmons, AO 85, and Rule 73 Memo delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 AO85)(DJP) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 5/11/2021. (DJP) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tania M. Fredricks. (DJP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT on Social Security Appeal filed by Tania M. Fredricks on 5/11/2021. (DJP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.