Whipple v. Unum Group Corporation
Plaintiff: Joy R. Whipple
Defendant: Unum Group Corporation
Case Number: 5:2010cv05075
Filed: September 14, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Western Division Office
County: Custer
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L. Viken
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 REDACTED ORDER 40 Order on Motion to Compel. Signed by U. S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 2/22/12. (SB)
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Compel. Signed by U. S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 1/17/12. (SB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whipple v. Unum Group Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joy R. Whipple
Represented By: Shiloh M. MacNally
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unum Group Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?