Graham Construction Services, Inc. v. Rapid City, City of
Plaintiff: Graham Construction Services, Inc.
Defendant: Rapid City, City of
Case Number: 5:2011cv05038
Filed: April 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Western Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L. Viken
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 4 Motion for a temporary restraining order. Signed by U. S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 5/3/11. (SB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham Construction Services, Inc. v. Rapid City, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Graham Construction Services, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick K. Duffy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rapid City, City of
Represented By: Jason E. Green
Represented By: Joel P. Landeen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?