American General Life Insurance Company v. Jenson

Defendant: Amy Jenson
Plaintiff: American General Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2011cv05057
Filed: July 8, 2011
Court: South Dakota District Court
Office: Western Division Office
County: Pennington
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L. Viken
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2012 33 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending granting defendant Amy Jenson's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 3/29/2012. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 03/12/12. (Duffy, Veronica) Modified by changing document type to Opinion on 3/13/2012 (DLC).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American General Life Insurance Company v. Jenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Jenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American General Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Michael C. Loos
Represented By: J. Crisman Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.