Benson v. Evans et al
| Shelly Benson |
| Deputy Matthew Tramp, Harry David Evans, Marty Mechaley, Does 1-20 and Custer County, South Dakota |
| 5:2019cv05062 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Harry David Evans on 10/16/19 (Shubeck, Michael) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shelly Benson. Custer County, South Dakota waiver sent on 8/29/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Shubeck, Michael) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shelly Benson. Marty Mechaley waiver sent on 9/10/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Shubeck, Michael) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shelly Benson. Matthew Tramp waiver sent on 9/10/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Shubeck, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Harry David Evans, Marty Mechaley, Matthew Tramp. 4 Summmons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO 85)(DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, ($400 fee paid, receipt# SDX500005986) filed by Shelly Benson. (DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
