Lloyd v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Plaintiff: Dedric J. Lloyd
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number: 1:2012cv00354
Filed: October 29, 2012
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Curtis L Collier
Referring Judge: Susan K Lee
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 6, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 15 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on March 6, 2014. (CNC, ) Mailed to Dedric Lloyd(CNC, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lloyd v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dedric J. Lloyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.