Fortune v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Kenneth Edwin Fortune
Case Number: 1:2013cv00024
Filed: February 5, 2013
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Hamilton
Referring Judge: Susan K Lee
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 2, 2014 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees; accepting and adopting 20 Report and Recommendations; denying as moot 21 Motion for a Status Conference. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 5/2/14. (JLMc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fortune v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Edwin Fortune
Represented By: Patrick A Cruise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?