Yoe v. Crescent Sock Company et al
||Robert H Yoe, III and Yoe Enterprises, Inc.
||Crescent Sock Company, Catherine Allen, Sandra Boyd, Patton Cotton, Samuel Jones and Jack Ewing
||January 6, 2015
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
||Susan K Lee
||Harry S Mattice
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 11, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RECONSIDERATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER.For the foregoing reasons, and as set forth herein, Plaintiffs motion for revision [Doc. 458] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Courts previous order on the summary judgment motions [Doc. 453] is VACATED IN PART to the extent it dismissed Plaintiffs FITS Claims arising prior to April 22, 2015, and to the extent it dismissed Plaintiffs FITS-only trade secret claims and Defendants FITS-only trade secret countercla ims. The Court hereby reinstates Plaintiffs FITS Claims asserted in Counts I, II, V, VIII, X, XI, and XIII of the third amended complaint, to the extent these claims arose after entry of the chancery courts Order Regarding Post Trial Motions on April 22, 2015. All FITS Claims arising prior to April 22, 2015, remain dismissed pursuant to the Courts November 14, 2017, memorandum and order [Doc. 453]. All FITS-only trade secret claims asserted in Counts VI, VII, and XVI are hereby reinstated. Defendants FITS-only trade secret counterclaims are hereby also reinstated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/11/2018. (BDG, )
|November 14, 2017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 320 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 322 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants motion for summary judgment [Doc. 320] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment [Doc.322] is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 11/14/2017. (BDG, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?