White et al v. City of Chattanooga et al (JRG1)
Plaintiff: Charles White, Tami Boring White and Heath Brandon Lee White
Defendant: City of Chattanooga, John Doe, 1, John Doe 2, Gary Robkin, Dallas Y Rucker, William Matlock, Kenneth Elwood and Charlie Young
Case Number: 1:2016cv00166
Filed: May 27, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Hamilton
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Compel. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs SHALL fully respond to Defendants interrogatories and requests for production of documents within 14 days of this Order. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs SHALL pay Defendants the reasonable attorneys fees and any expenses incurred in filing the motion to compel and supporting memorandum. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/8/2017. (BDG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White et al v. City of Chattanooga et al (JRG1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles White
Represented By: Robin R Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tami Boring White
Represented By: Robin R Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heath Brandon Lee White
Represented By: Robin R Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chattanooga
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe, 1
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 2
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Robkin
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dallas Y Rucker
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Matlock
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Elwood
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlie Young
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Represented By: Melinda J Foster
Represented By: Phillip A Noblett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?