Ingram v. Covenant Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shawn Ingram
Defendant: Covenant Transport, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv00490
Filed: December 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Christopher H Steger
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING SEALING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 2/23/2017. (AML, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingram v. Covenant Transport, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Ingram
Represented By: Austin Ryan Simmons
Represented By: Jonathan A Street
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Covenant Transport, Inc.
Represented By: John R Bode
Represented By: Megan Welton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?