Stamper v. Heritage Hosiery, Inc.
Colby Faye Stamper |
Heritage Hosiery, Inc. |
1:2019cv00254 |
September 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Susan K Lee |
Harry S Mattice |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: The Jury Trial is set for 12/8/2020 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 - Chattanooga before District Judge Harry S Mattice Jr. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 11/23/2020 04:00 PM in Courtroom 3 - Chattanooga before District Judge Harry S Mattice Jr..Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 10/4/2019. (BJL) |
Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hickey, B) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Colby Faye Stamper (Ward, Joshua) |
Filing 11 ORDER Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 09/13/2019. (KLW) |
Filing 10 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 9/13/2019. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice of Consent/Non Consent) (BJL) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Heritage Hosiery, Inc..(Hickey, B) |
Filing 8 Administrative Notice to Counsel #7 Supplement : INFORMATIONAL ONLY. (BJL) |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by Heritage Hosiery, Inc.. (Hickey, B) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Heritage Hosiery, Inc.. (Hickey, B) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 9/6/19. (KFB) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 9/6/19. (KFB) |
Filing 3 Order Governing Depositions.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 9/6/19. (KFB) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Notice of Removal, : requirements due by 9/11/2019. (KFB) |
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Corporate Interest as required by FRCP 7.1 by Heritage Hosiery, Inc. (KFB) |
District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (KFB) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Chancery, case number 19-0367. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-4071814), filed by Heritage Hosiery, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Copy of Process & Pleadings filed in State Court Case, #2 Exhibit Copy Notice of Removal Filed in State Court Case)(Hickey, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stamper v. Heritage Hosiery, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Heritage Hosiery, Inc. | |
Represented By: | B Thomas Hickey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Colby Faye Stamper | |
Represented By: | Stephen Kyle McDonald |
Represented By: | Joshua R Ward |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.