Benford v. Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC (PLR3)
Jameisha Benford |
Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC |
1:2019cv00268 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Susan K Lee |
Pamela L Reeves |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
38 U.S.C. ยง 4301 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC (Nicely, Charles) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hamill, Douglas) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: the trial of this case will be held before the undersigned United States District Judge, with a jury, beginning on TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Knoxville, Tennessee in Courtroom 3C. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on October 15, 2019. (AYB) |
Filing 10 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 10/15/19. (Attachments: #1 (KFB) |
Filing 9 REFILED AS DOCUMENT #10 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 10/15/19. (KFB) Modified on 10/15/2019 (KFB). |
Filing 8 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC identifying Corporate Parent The Woodbridge Group, Corporate Parent INOAC Company for Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC. (Nicely, Charles) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC.(Nicely, Charles) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jameisha Benford. Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC served on 9/23/2019. (Hamill, Douglas) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 09/19/2019. (CAT) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 09/19/2019. (CAT) |
Filing 3 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 09/19/2019. (CAT) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC. (CAT) |
District Judge Pamela L Reeves and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (CAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC, filed by Jameisha Benford. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Woodbridge)(Hamill, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Benford v. Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC (PLR3) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Woodbridge Inoac Technical Products Chattanooga LLC | |
Represented By: | Charles M Nicely |
Represented By: | Everett L Hixson, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jameisha Benford | |
Represented By: | Douglas S Hamill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.