Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC et al v. Yao et al (PLR1)
| Edward Buiel and Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC |
| EnPower, Inc. and Adrian Yao |
| 1:2019cv00366 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Susan K Lee |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Trial Preference by EnPower, Inc., Adrian Yao. (Ogden, Seth) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by John P Konvalinka on behalf of Edward Buiel, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC (Konvalinka, John) |
Filing 16
ORDER terminating (8) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting (10) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Stephen D Adams and John G Jackson terminated in case 1:19-cv-00366-PLR-SKL; terminating (15) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting (17) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Stephen D Adams and John G Jackson terminated in case 1:19-cv-00368-PLR-SKL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 2/4/2020. (BDG)Order mailed to plaintiffs at 1086 Duncan Ave.,Chattanooga, TN 37404.
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 6/29/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3C - Knoxville before District Judge Pamela L Reeves. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 02/03/20. (JBR)
|
| Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee: Motion Hearing held on 1/30/2020 re #10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC, Edward Buiel. (CNC) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney , #11 Order Setting Hearing on Motion, by John G Jackson on behalf of Edward Buiel, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC (Jackson, John) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by EnPower, Inc., Adrian Yao. (Ogden, Seth) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney , #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Discovery Requests : Motion Hearing set for 1/30/2020 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4 - Chattanooga before Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee.Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 1/21/20. This Order serviced via US Mail to Plaintiff.(KFB)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Edward Buiel, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC. (Jackson, John) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Discovery Requests filed by EnPower, Inc., Adrian Yao. (Ogden, Seth) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Discovery Requests by Edward Buiel, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Discovery Requests)(Jackson, John) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Of Consent/ Non-Consent) (BDG)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, COUNTERCLAIM against Edward Buiel, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC by Adrian Yao, EnPower, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit 1 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #2 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit 2 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #3 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit 3 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #4 Exhibit 4 - Exhibit 4 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #5 Exhibit 5 - Exhibit 5 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #6 Exhibit 6 - Exhibit 6 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #7 Exhibit 7 - Exhibit 7 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #8 Exhibit 8 - Exhibit 8 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #9 Exhibit 9 - Exhibit 9 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #10 Exhibit 10 - Exhibit 10 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #11 Exhibit 11 - Exhibit 11 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #12 Exhibit 12 - Exhibit 12 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #13 Exhibit 13 - Exhibit 13 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #14 Exhibit 14 - Exhibit 14 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #15 Exhibit 15 - Exhibit 15 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #16 Exhibit 16 - Exhibit 16 to the Chancery Court Hearing, #17 Exhibit 17 - Transcript of the Chancery Court Hearing, #18 Exhibit 18 - AY014773-AY014777, #19 Exhibit 19 - AY000094-AY000110, #20 Exhibit 20 - AY018217-AY018220, #21 Exhibit 21 - AY030688, #22 Exhibit 22 - AY027193-AY027203, #23 Exhibit 23 - AY000076-AY000078, #24 Exhibit 24 - AY051117-AY051318, #25 Exhibit 25 - AY018939-AY018945, #26 Exhibit 26 - AY051319-AY051344)(Ogden, Seth) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Edward Buiel, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC. (Jackson, John) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Relating Cases : Create association to 1:19-cv-00076-SKL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 12/30/19. (CNC)
|
| District Judge Pamela L Reeves and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (CNC) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Edward Buiel, Coulometrics LLC, Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC. (Jackson, John) |
| Filing 2 PATENT AND TRADEMARK NOTICE in compliance with 35 USC 290 and/or 15 USC 1116 regarding 10,038,193 and 10,069,145 . (Jackson, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Chancery Court, case number 18-0343. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4168724), filed by Edward Buiel Consulting, LLC, Edward Buiel, Coulometrics LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Index of Collective Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Jackson, John) |
| Case referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Lee for related case determination (JCK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
