Kelch v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Kaleb Kelch
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 1:2021cv00237
Filed: October 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Travis R McDonough
Referring Judge: Christopher H Steger
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kaleb Kelch. SSA Office of General Counsel served on 10/12/2021; Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 10/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Jackson, Forrest)
October 6, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE re IFP Service (Attorney Representation) re 3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Summons Issued as to USA. (SAC)
October 6, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (SAC)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for good cause shown. The Clerk of Court shall issue any necessary service packets. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 10-6-21. This entry is the Order of the Court. There is no document attached. (KMG)
October 6, 2021 District Judge Travis R McDonough and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (JCK)
October 5, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kaleb Kelch. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(Jackson, Forrest)
October 5, 2021 Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Kaleb Kelch. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons #1, #3 Summons #2, #4 Summons #3, #5 Supplement Assignment of EAJA Fees)(Jackson, Forrest)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelch v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaleb Kelch
Represented By: Forrest Earl Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?