Harrah v. Alltel Communications, Inc
Plaintiff: Jane E Harrah
Defendant: Alltel Communications, Inc
Case Number: 2:2007cv00144
Filed: June 25, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Carter
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Presiding Judge: Dennis H Inman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: It is hereby ORDERED that Alltels Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 16], is GRANTED, and the plaintiffs Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. A judgment consistent with this opinion shall enter. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 7/13/2009. (RLC, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrah v. Alltel Communications, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane E Harrah
Represented By: Mary F Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alltel Communications, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?