Hale v. Greene County Police Dept. et al
Jimmy Dean Hale |
Greene County, Town of Greeneville and Greene County Police Dept. |
2:2019cv00130 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
Travis R McDonough |
Christopher H Steger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. Magistrate Judge M Clifton L Corker no longer assigned to case. Reassigned pursuant to SO 19-13 (BDG) |
Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/19/2019. (Copy of Order mailed to Jimmy Dean Hale)(JCK) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/19/2019. (Copy of Order mailed to Jimmy Dean Hale) (JCK) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Depositions Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/19/2019. (Copy of Order mailed to Jimmy Dean Hale) (JCK) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (Copy of Notice mailed to Jimmy Dean Hale)(JCK) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Greene County, Greene County Police Dept., Town of Greeneville (Filing fee NOT PAID), filed by Jimmy Dean Hale.(JCK) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jimmy Dean Hale. (JCK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.