Barnett v. Hawkins County, Tennessee et al
| Gabriel Barnett |
| Hawkins County, Tennessee, Michael Martin, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Ronnie Lawson |
| 2:2021cv00066 |
| April 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Charles E Atchley |
| Cynthia R Wyrick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Withdraw. Mr. Shelton avers that he believed his application for admission to the bar of this District would be processed before the period for filing a pro hac vice motion had passed. Mr. Shelton further avers that his application remains pending, which prompted the instant Motion. The Motion avers that Corey B. Shipley and Michael Curtis Collins will continueto represent Defendant in this matter; the Motion further advises that Plaintiff was notified of this situation and consented to Mr. Shelton's withdrawal. Timothy Hunter Shelton is relieved of further obligation in this matter. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove Timothy Hunter Shelton as counsel of record in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick on 4/21/2021. (LCK)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw by Gabriel Barnett. (Collins, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Hawkins County, Tennessee, John and Jane Does 1-10(employees of the Hawkins County Sheriff's Office), John and Jane Does 1-10(Individually), Ronnie Lawson(Hawkins County Sheriff), Ronnie Lawson(Individually), Michael Martin(Individually), Michael Martin(Hawkins County Sheriff's Deputy). (Attachments: #1 Summons John and Jane Does, #2 Summons Deputy Michael Martin, #3 Summons Sheriff Ronnie Lawson)(LCK) |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, John and Jane Does Summons by Gabriel Barnett. (Collins, Michael) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, Deputy Michael Martin Summons by Gabriel Barnett. (Collins, Michael) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, Sheriff Lawson Summons by Gabriel Barnett. (Collins, Michael) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint, Hawkins County Summons by Gabriel Barnett. (Collins, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Deficiency (Pro Hac) as to Attorney T. Hunter Shelton: Attorney is not admitted (See LR 83.5). This matter will be referred to a magistrate judge if a pro hac motion is not filed within 15 days of this Notice. (LCK) |
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 4/5/2021. (LCK)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 4/5/2021. (LCK)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 4/5/2021. (LCK)
|
| Filing 2 Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Complaint: Please submit a completed and flattened summons for each party using the event "Supplement" and linking it back to the complaint. Requirements due by 4/12/2021. (LCK) |
| District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr and Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick added. (LCK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4701759.), filed by Gabriel Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Hawkins County Summons, #3 Summons Sheriff Lawson Summons, #4 Summons Deputy Michael Martin, #5 Summons John and Jane Does)(Collins, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
